Icon class icon_class far fa-sticky-note icon_class_computed far fa-sticky-note Note kind ASSERTION Keywords SysPhS humidifier Relates to BDD & PD: VaporGenerationPlantCalculation BDD & PD: TemperatureIncrease BDD & PD: EvaporationCalculation BDD & PD: EvaporationCalculation2 Related notes [ASSERTION] Webel vs SysPhS-1.1: Annex A.5: Humidifier: If the WaterTank::tankVolume 50,000 is measured in litres (L) the VaporPressureCalculation::volume within the HumidifiedRoom can't possibly be 25000.0 litre (L), it has to be 25000.0 (m^3), which is NOT a "room" [ASSERTION] Webel vs SysPhS-1.1: Annex A.5: Humidifier: In the Webel version it will be tentatively assumed we are in fact dealing with a large humidified space like an office building NOT a single "humidified room" - despite the block name HumidifiedRoom in the spec [ASSERTION] Webel vs SysPhS-1.1: Annex A.5: Humidifier: It is assumed that "energy" is a rate (equivalent to a power). [ASSERTION] Webel vs SysPhS-1.1: Annex A.5: Humidifier: It is assumed that "radiation" is a rate (equivalent to a power). [ASSERTION]{STRONG} Webel vs SysPhS-1.1: Annex A.5: Humidifier: It is assumed that "vapor" is a volume rate corresponding to the rate of consumption OF HEATED LIQUID WATER (from a tank) used to create the vapor. [ASSERTION] Webel vs SysPhS-1.1: Annex A.5: Humidifier: It is assumed that 'HumidityBalance::volume = 25,000' and 'VaporPressureCalculation::volume = 25,000' are the same fixed SpaceVolume in cubic metres (m^3). Related notes (backlinks) [ASSERTION] Webel vs SysPhS-1.1: Annex A.5: Humidifier: The restriction of "vapor" to the range 0..1 in EvaporationCalculation2 seems completely arbitrary, it is NOT a ratio! [ASSERTION] Webel vs SysPhS-1.1: Annex A.5: Humidifier: Dimensional analysis of TemperatureIncrease and EvaporationCalculation implies the 'specificHeat' is a volumetric heat capacity, not a specific heat capacity (heat capacity per unit of mass). Related snippets (extracts) Visit also SysPhS-1.1 Visit also (backlinks) Flags
