Webel vs SysPhS-1.1: Diagramming style: DO NOT recommend overlapping Connectors with "phantom" fork (or junction) as shown in in 'Figure 48: Internal structure of the signal processor'

Icon class
icon_class
far fa-sticky-note
icon_class_computed
far fa-sticky-note
Note kind
ANTI-PATTERN
WARNING
Policy level
STRONG
Specification keywords
SysML-1.6
SysML-1.7
SysMLv2
SysPhS-1.1
UML keywords
Connector
Keywords
Click on the image to view it full size
This page contains content quoted, copied, or adapted, from the following Object Management Group specification for educational purposes: SysPhS-1.1. The OMG retains the original © copyright.
In Modelica there is no explicit support for a "node". For electrical systems one can use an explicit Pin. See also: Is it possible to add a node to a circuit model in SystemModeler?
Relates to
IBD: Figure 48: Internal structure of the signal processor
Related notes
[ISSUE] SysPhS-1.1 spec version of 'Figure 38: Internal structure of the circuit example' shows some bi-directional ItemFlows for Charge on overlapping Connector line sections, which are impossible to interpret.
[ISSUE] SysPhS-1.1 spec version of 'Figure 38: Internal structure of the circuit example' shows some bi-directional ItemFlows for Charge on overlapping Connector line sections, which are impossible to interpret.
[ANTI-PATTERN, MODELLING, STYLE]{STRONG} Webel Best Practice: SysML/SysPhS: DO NOT use overlapping Connector lines from/to one Port (can be misunderstood as "summed" flow and/or physical node/fork/junction).
[ANTI-PATTERN, ISSUE]{STRONG} Webel vs SysPhS-1.1: Diagramming style: DO NOT recommend overlapping Connectors as shown in 'Figure 38: Internal structure of the circuit example'
Related notes (backlinks)
Related snippets (extracts)
Visit also
SysPhS-1.1
Visit also (backlinks)
External links
Is it possible to add a node to a circuit model in SystemModeler?
SystemModeler join wires